Theosophy World — Home Page

tw199812.txt December 1998 Issue [HOME] [ONLINE ARCHIVES] [DOWNLOAD]

THEOSOPHY WORLD ---------------------------------- December, 1998

An Internet Magazine Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy
And its Practical Application in the Modern World

To submit papers or news items, subscribe, or unsubscribe, write

(Please note that the materials presented in THEOSOPHY WORLD are 
the intellectual property of their respective authors and may not 
be reposted or otherwise republished without prior permission.)


"Devotion," by Mrs. Isabel Cooper-Oakley
"Audio Recording of G. de Purucker," by Eldon Tucker
"The Theosophical Movement: 1875 - 1998," by Dallas TenBroeck
"Innovative Theosophy," by Eldon Tucker
"Incorrodible Bronze," H.T. Edge
"Myth of the Masters," by Sy Ginsburg
"Theosophical Directions," by Nancy B. Conley
"Different Models of Globes, Planes, and Principles," by
    Eldon Tucker
"Women in the Theosophical Movement," Part I, by James Santucci
"Cycles in the Universe and the Harmonics Theory," by Ray Tomes
"How to Spend a Fun Day," by John R. Crocker


> Everything is regulated in all things once for all with as much
> order and agreement as possible, since supreme wisdom and goodness
> cannot act without perfect harmony: the present is big with the
> future, what is to come could be read in the past, what is distant
> expressed in what is near. The beauty of the Universe could be 
> learnt in each soul, could one unravel all its folds which develop
> perceptibly only with time.
> -- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, PRINCIPLES OF NATURE AND GRACE, 201


by Mrs. Isabel Cooper-Oakley

OF RELIGIONS, pages 174 to 176.]

It is sometimes said, and said untruly, that in Theosophy there
is no devotional life. This comes only from the lips of those
who have made no deep study of the subject. There is in
Theosophy a devotional life, as deep, as true, and as fervent as
was ever taught in any religious system that has been known
throughout the world. Now, I will divide my subject into two
portions, the first, the general aspect, and then the particular
application of it to us as Theosophists.

You have all of you heard of occultism, and occultism is the very
center of Theosophy. Now, the word "occultism" in itself wants
definition. There is good occultism, and there is what is called
black magic; the first is white; it is that which is good, wise,
unselfish, pure, true. Black magic or occultism is that which is
selfishness, in which persons try to gain for themselves only and
try to develop themselves for their own personal benefit. Now,
when I am speaking of occultism I am not talking of black
occultism. H. P. Blavatsky in a very fine article draws a very
strong distinction between true occultism and what she calls
occult frauds. I am not speaking of a little clairvoyance, or a
little clairaudience, or a little thought-transference, or a
great many other dabbing in what people call occultism. I am
speaking of the real development of the soul life which belongs
to that school of occultism that lies at the very center of
Theosophy. In India there are many schools of occultism. At the
back of the Theosophical Society there is one school of occultism
which is based on the highest, most unselfish, and most devoted
line of teaching. It is one of the inner schools which is taught
by those Masters whom we know to be at the back of the
Theosophical Society, and therefore, when I am speaking of
occultism, I am not referring to any other school, any Western
school, or any Eastern school except this one form of development
of the divine light within man.

Now Theosophy, as you know, is philosophy and a science and
religion, and therefore when it comes to deal with the deepest
part of the soul's life, it has not only the fervent aspirations
of the religious systems which you know, it has not only the
devotion which you see in so many other religions, but it has
absolutely the scientific method by which the soul of man may be
developed, by which the soul of man may come into touch with the
divine soul, which, is the very life-principle of the whole
universe. What is termed Yoga in India means the method by which
the soul of man, the divine spirit and mind of man, may link
itself with that divine spirit and life from which man comes,
from which he is only divided by his material senses, of which
spirit he is only a little shadow for the time being during his
short earthly career. Now, in speaking of the teaching that we
have in the Theosophical Society there is one book, one priceless
little book, which has been left to us by Helena Petrovna
Blavatsky, which was written for those whom she termed "The few."
Why? Because she knew that it was only the few in the hurry and
the press of the everyday life, it was only the few who would
really stand aside from the stream of life and try to give some
thought and some time to the soul within. She translated this
book from one of those priceless treasures then in the possession
of the Eastern teachers of Theosophy. It is called THE BOOK OF
GOLDEN PRECEPTS, and from it she has gathered some few of the
precepts which those who really desire to develop their spiritual
life will take up and study. Dedicated as it is to the few, it
is only the few who really find benefit in it. It is called THE
VOICE OF THE SILENCE. The name is in itself paradoxical, but the
name in itself is a volume of teaching. It is the Voice of the
Silence because it is only when the Silence and the hush come
over the material part of man's life that the real Voice of the
Silence can speak. It is only when man will take a little time to
still his worldly life, to still his worldly thoughts, that the
true small Voice which really lives in the heart of every man may
make itself heard. And therefore Helena Petrovna Blavatsky gave
us this book, leaving it to the few who would listen in the
Silence to the Voice that would speak, and she gave it to us as
the guide, the prayer book, and the very basis of our daily life.

The book itself is divided into three portions; it is divided
into The Two Paths, the two paths which are spoken of, and
preached of, and talked of in every religious system in the
world. Jesus Christ in speaking of the life of the soul spoke of
the broad path, and said that: broad was the way that led to
destruction and narrow the gate that leads to life eternal. 
Narrow is the gate also that leads to this life eternal. The
gate is the narrowing down and crushing out of all the lower
principles of man. It is, if we may so call it, the toning down
of all the lower principles and making them one with that
vibrating chord which is the keynote of that inner life. And
when a man starts upon that narrow way, then there lies before
him another work to be done. Putting our foot forward only, and
making our choice of the narrow way, does not clear up for us all
the work we have to do. Then comes the taking of ourselves in
hand, then comes all the struggling with our selfish natures, the
putting away of the selfish desire for life, the putting aside of
all material wishes of this world; and then we come face to face
with what is termed in this book The Seven Portals. The Seven
Portals are seven gateways which should be opened by every man
and woman as they pass onward and upward into the devotional life
in Theosophy. You have all of you heard of the Seven Deadly Sins
in the Roman Catholic church. Now the seven deadly sins are
exactly those sins that stand in our way; those are the very
seven deadly sins which bar our pathway; they are analogous to
the seven principles of man; and those portals have to be opened
one by one, just as the principles have to be crushed out, the
lower principles, one by one; and it is only as we open those
portals in front of us that the development of the true divine
life within really takes place. When the six portals are opened
and we stand in front of the seventh portal, when the lower
principles of man are all under control and we stand in the light
within and it is trying to make its vibrating impulse heard
within our hearts, then are we getting some little way upon that
path which every great teacher of the world has talked about.

Now, when the seven portals are open, when all these lower
principles are stilled, then comes what H. P. Blavatsky speaks
of as the Voice of the Silence. She speaks here, making the same
division always made in Theosophical teachings, the distinction
between the higher and the lower self: "The self of matter and
the self of spirit can never meet; one of the twain must
disappear; there is no place for both." There is no place,
friends, for the self of our lower natures if we want to live
according to the highest and the purest of Theosophical
teachings. "Kill out desire, but if thou killest it take heed
lest from the dead it should again arise." That means, even when
getting onwards in this path, even when by means of daily
crushing out our most besetting faults, even when by daily
meditation and daily aspiration we are trying to get some little
way upon that pathway, we have to keep a watch over this
hydra-headed monster of our lower natures, trying ever hard to
crop up again into life, trying ever to crush down this gentle
Voice which is trying to make itself heard. "Kill out the love
of life; but if thou slayest TANHA, let this not be for thirst of
life eternal, to replace the fleeting by the everlasting."

The fundamental teaching in Theosophy is this: All this work is
not to be done for ourselves alone; the fundamental teaching of
the devotional life is not to seek our own salvation, is not to
get a place in that heaven for ourselves, but to perfect
ourselves in this work, to purge ourselves of this lower nature,
so that when the Voice of the Silence can be heard in our hearts
we are then better instruments for those teachers to work
through, we are better helpers for those who are teachers, to
make the Voice of the Silence heard in the heart of every man and
every woman around us. Why not, friends, take some time in your
daily life, every one of you, give up some little, some little
time in which you may try to listen to the Voice of the Silence. 
Down through the ages those reproachful words of Christ, when
coming out of his agony in the garden, when coming out of the
agony he was going through for all humanity, he turned around to
Peter and said: "What! Could ye not watch with me one hour?" And
in the heart of every man there is that note of reproach ringing
from the Voice of the Silence within: What! In this material
civilization, can ye not watch one hour, can ye not give up a few
moments of your daily life and think of that life we are crushing
out here? Can ye not put out for a few moments all earthly
desires, acts, and wishes, and give some few moments for The
Voice of the Silence to be heard in your hearts?" Look at it
from what point you will, look at it how you can, that is the
thing you will have to arrive at sooner or later. If you will
not make it willingly now, you will have to make it sometime in
this life, or if not in this life, at some future time. If you
are going to live your life for yourself only, if you are going
to live to help the material civilization to go on in the way it
is now going, then you should give up your life to the material
world and crush out that Voice if you will, but you yourself in
your next lives will pay the penalty, according to the
Theosophical teaching. We can lay no burden on humanity by
selfishness which we shall not come back and bear ourselves. For
the sake of humanity what is the reason you cannot give up some
time of your daily life? Every moment of your daily life that you
put aside to think, even ten minutes, about this Voice of
conscience within, even if you take but ten minutes to let the
spiritual side of your nature speak, you are helping all
humanity, you are helping the whole world in a way that no
material work you can do can help; because just so far as we
develop our spiritual nature, Helena Petrovna Blavatsky taught us
that just so far as we develop this spiritual side, we are
helping the whole world upward, we are helping the spiritual
cycle upward. That it is only when the Voice of the Silence
speaks in our hearts that we add to the Voice of the Silence that
is speaking in the hearts of every man and woman that that
work can harmonize with the divine life in the material world in
which we live. And these are the messages she left to us, this
was the book and teaching she put into our hands for all those
who really want to listen and to learn the devotional side of
Theosophy. It gives you step by step the way in which your
devotional life should be led, it gives you step by step the
thoughts, the work, the methods by which the Voice of the Silence
can be arrived at. And with this message given to us by her to
hand down to humanity, I say that it is not true when people say
to us that there is no devotional life in Theosophy. It is
there, it is there for every man and woman to learn if they
choose to find it. For the Voice of the Silence lives in the
heart of every man and every woman, and it is our fault, and it
is a fault for which we shall have to pay if we do not let it
teach us at some time or another.


by Eldon Tucker

A partially restored lecture of G. de Purucker, 18 minutes in 
length, is available on the Internet in RealAudio format. It can 
be listened to at:

(This link will cause your web browser to download and start 
playing the file. Before the file finishes playing, you can use 
RealAudio to save the file to disk, for future replay. The file
is 2256 KB in size, and it represents an 18 minute, 18 second

The lecture, given on a radio station in Holland in 1937, was 
originally recorded on a cylinder recording device. It was later 
copied to magnetic tape, and an attempt to professionally restore 
it was made. There is still quite a bit of static, but it's still
possible to make out and listen to Purucker's voice.

The tape, provided by Rick Nurrie-Stearns, is entitled "Theosophy 
and the Invisible and Visible Universe."


by Dallas TenBroeck

[Offered in commemoration of the inauguration of the modern
Theosophical Movement. November 17th 1998]

> Theosophy is the "Wisdom-religion," or "Divine Wisdom." The
> substratum and basis of all the world-religions and philosophies,
> taught and practiced by a few elect ever since man became a
> thinking being. In its practical bearing, Theosophy is purely
> divine ethics ... 

> [Theosophy is ] Intellectually, an attitude; practically, a
> method; ethically a spirit; and religiously, a life ... Its creed
> is loyalty to Truth, and its ritual "to honor every Truth by
> use.

> Theosophist is "a name by which mystics at various periods of
> history have called themselves. The Neo-Platonists of Alexandria
> were Theosophists; the Alchemists and Kabalists during the
> medieval ages were likewise so called ... All real lovers of
> divine Wisdom and Truth had, and have a right to the name."

> The principles of a group called Theosophical would be: First:
> "(1) Brotherhood of man, without distinction of race, color,
> religion, or social position; (2) the serious study of the
> ancient world-religions for purposes of comparison and the
> selection therefrom of universal ethics; [and] (3) the study and
> development of the latent divine powers in man ... "

> There is a universal Divine Revelation called the Perennial
> Philosophy, or the "Wisdom Religion" and its traces can be found
> in the teachings, however fragmentary and incomplete, that are
> partially contained in ancient texts belonging to the Hindu, the
> Zoroastrian, the Chaldean, the Egyptian religion, to Buddhism,
> Islam, Judaism, and to Christianity, but to none exclusively. 
> "The Secret Doctrine is the essence of all these. Sprung from it
> in their origins, the various religious schemes are now made to
> merge back into their original element, out of which every
> mystery and dogma has grown, developed, and become materialized.

> What is the history of the "Wisdom Religion?" It has its origins
> with thinking man. It is the one religion which underlies all
> the now-existing creeds. That "faith" which being primordial,
> and revealed directly to human kind by their progenitors and
> informing Egos required no "grace," nor blind faith to believe,
> for it was knowledge ... It is on this Wisdom Religion that
> Theosophy is based.

> It is an "unveiling" of old, very old, truths to minds hitherto
> ignorant of them, ignorant even of the existence and preservation
> of any such archaic knowledge.

> The Wisdom-Religion was ever one, and being the last word of
> possible human knowledge, was, therefore, carefully preserved. 
> It preceded by long ages the Alexandrian Theosophists, reached
> the modern, and will survive every other religion and philosophy. 
> It was preserved among the Initiates of every country; among
> profound seekers after truth -- their disciples; and in those parts
> of the world where such topics have always been most valued and
> pursued: In India, Central Asia, and Persia.

> We can assert, with entire plausibility, that there is not one
> of the many sects -- Kabalism, Judaism, and our present
> Christianity included -- but sprang from the two main branches of
> that one mother-trunk, the one universal religion, which
> antedated the Vedic ages -- we speak of that prehistoric Buddhism
> which merged later into Brahmanism." ( ISIS II p.123) "By
> Buddhism ... we mean that religion signifying literally the
> doctrine of wisdom, and which, by many ages, antedates the
> metaphysical philosophy of Siddhartha Sakyamuni.

Hinting at the future, HPB says that none of the opponents of
Theosophy and its Truth-bearing mission will be able to "uproot
Theosophy, nor even upset her Society, if only its members hold

> If Theosophy prevailing in the struggle, its all-embracing
> philosophy strikes deep roots in the minds and hearts of
> men, ... then indeed will dawn a new day of joy and gladness for
> all who suffer and are outcast. For real Theosophy is ALTRUISM,
> and we cannot repeat it too often. It is brotherly love, mutual
> help, unswerving devotion to truth. If men do but realize that
> in these alone can true happiness be found, and never in wealth,
> possessions or any selfish gratification, then the dark clouds
> will roll away, and a new humanity be born upon earth. Then the
> GOLDEN AGE will be there, indeed.
> -- WQJ ARTICLES, I, 381

> Striving thus in unison with your Higher Self, your efforts must
> and will be fruitful of good to the Society, to yourselves, to
> Humanity. Coming years will show a steady, healthy growth, a
> strong, united organization, a durable, reliable, and efficient
> instrument ready to the Masters' hands. Once united in real
> solidarity, in the true spirit of Universal Brotherhood, no power
> can overthrow you, no obstacle bar your progress, no barrier
> check the advance of Theosophy in the coming century ... there is a
> power behind the society which will give us the strength we need,
> which will enable us to move the world, if we will but Unite and
> Work as one mind, one heart. The Masters require only that each
> shall do his best, and, above all, that each shall strive in
> reality to feel himself one with his fellow workers ... a true,
> hearty, earnest devotion to our cause which will lead each to
> help his brother to the utmost of his power to work for that
> cause, whether or not we agree as to the exact method of carrying
> on that work. The only man who is absolutely wrong in his method
> is the one who does nothing; each can and should cooperate with
> all and all with each in a large-hearted spirit of comradeship to
> forward the work of bringing Theosophy home to every man and
> woman in the country.

> The problem of true Theosophy and its great mission are, first,
> the working out of clear unequivocal conceptions of ethic ideas
> and duties such as shall best and most fully satisfy the right
> and altruistic feelings in men; and, second, the molding of these
> conceptions for their adaptation into such forms of daily life,
> as shall offer a field where they may be applied with most
> equitableness.
> Such is the common work placed before all who are willing to act
> on these principles ... Do not indulge personally in unbrotherly
> comparison between the task accomplished by yourself and the work
> left undone by your neighbor or brothers. In the fields of
> Theosophy none is held to weed out a larger plot of ground than
> his strength and capacity will permit him. Do not be too severe
> on the merits or demerits of one who seeks admission among your
> ranks, as the truth about the actual state of the inner man can
> only be known to Karma, and can be dealt with justly by that
> all-seeing LAW alone.
> -- THEOSOPHY MAGAZINE, Vol. 70, 242

> It is the Master's work to preserve the true philosophy, but the
> help of the companions is needed to rediscover and promulgate it. 
> Once more the elder brothers have indicated where the
> truth -- Theosophy -- could be found, and the companions all over the
> world are engaged in bringing it forth for wider currency and
> propagation.

> We have offered to exhume the primeval strata of man's being,
> his basic nature, and lay bare the wonderful complications of his
> inner Self ... and demonstrate it scientifically ... It is our
> mission to plunge and bring the pearls of Truth to the surface;
> theirs [men of science] to clean and set them into scientific
> jewels ... For countless generations hath the adept built a fane
> of imperishable rocks ... to invite the elite of mankind to
> cooperate with him and help in his turn enlighten superstitious
> man ... until that day when the foundations of a new continent of
> thought are ... firmly built ... 

> The main and underlying effort of the work ... should be to
> furnish a real and philosophical basis for ethics ... Opposition to
> dogma is not opposition to truth, and hence the Society is a
> builder up and not a mere destroyer of old beliefs ... The
> philosophy put forward ... gives reasonable explanations of life,
> of man, and of nature: tends to remove superstition by showing
> what psychical phenomena are, and why they occur ... meets all the
> facts and solves them, and shows how man may, if he will, reach
> to the power hinted at by all the great teachers of the world.

> ... learn that you may teach, acquire spiritual knowledge and
> strength that the weak may lean on you ... make your home one of
> the most important centers of spiritualizing influence in all the
> world ... encouraging the visits of your fellow members and of
> enquirers and by holding meetings of the more congenial for study
> and instruction ... constantly advise with your associates in the
> Council how to make the general meetings of the Lodge
> interesting. New members should be taken in hand from the
> first ... and instructed thoroughly in what you have already
> learnt, so that they may be capable of participating
> intelligently in the proceedings ... keep in correspondence with
> all others [who] need your help ... your Branch can, and should
> help ... to circulate [the Mother Society's] publications and to
> have them translated into other languages when worthy of
> it ... Deeds are what we want and demand ... Think you the truth has
> been shown to you for your sole advantage? That we have broken
> the silence of centuries for the profit of a handful of dreamers
> only? The converging lines of your Karma have drawn each and all
> of you into this Society as to a common focus that you may each
> help to work out the results of your interrupted beginnings in
> the last birth.

> ... the plan is to keep [the Movement] alive as an active, free,
> unsectarian body during the time of waiting for the next great
> messenger, who will be herself beyond question ... And in this time
> of waiting the Master, that great Initiate, whose single will
> upholds the entire movement, "will have his mighty hand spread
> wide behind the Society.
> -- WQJ ARTICLES, II, 153

> ..the ethics of Theosophy are more important than any
> divulgement of psychic laws and facts ... the Ethics sink into and
> take hold of the real man -- the reincarnating Ego ... Learn well,
> then, the doctrines of Karma and Reincarnation, and teach,
> practice and promulgate that system of life and through which
> alone can save the coming races.

> Theosophists are of necessity the friends of all movements ... for
> the amelioration of the conditions of mankind ... [to] seek to lift
> a little of the tremendous weight of misery that is crushing down
> the poor ... The function of Theosophists is to open men's hearts
> and understandings to charity, justice, and generosity,
> attributes which belong to the human kingdom and are natural to
> man when he has developed the qualities of a human being. 
> Theosophy teaches the animal-man to become a human-man.


by Eldon Tucker

A workshop was recently held at the Los Angeles branch of the 
United Lodge of Theosophists. Around 25 people attended the event, 
running for the full day, Saturday, November 14. Both local 
members and members from the Upland study group attended.

Entitled "Workshop on Effective Collaboration in Working Together 
for the Cause of Universal Brotherhood," the meeting was called 
together by some interested students from the United Lodge of 

Three theosophical students with both a solid backgroud in the 
philosophy and substantial academic and psychological skills put 
on the program: April and Jerry Hejka-Ekins, and Lee Renner, all 
of California State University, Stanislaus.

The program was greatly appreciated by all who attended, myself 
included. Were such a program put on as a college extension 
course, it could have easily cost $120 to $160 per person. The 
three out-of-town students put it on for free, and travelled
to Los Angeles at their own expense too! The program was 
additionally beneficial because of their knowledge of Theosophy 
and theosophical group dynamics.

Some of the areas covered included recognizing communication 
problems, overcoming behavioral barriers to shared meaning, active 
listening feedback, steps in giving feedback, and developing group 

Although the ULT Lodge is located in a bad part of town, a 
security guard had been hired to watch cars and activities outside 
the building while the meeting was being held.

The building itself is two-stories, and has several rooms, meeting 
halls, including a large auditorium that can seat hundreds, and 
several libraries. It is of older construction, but has been kept 
up well. Our group met in a small, cozy room on the second floor, 
with sofas and nicer chairs -- and most importantly a coffee 

We were somewhat uncomfortable, but after only a few minutes, 
after having participated in an "ice breaker," there was a warm, 
relaxed, friendly atmosphere, and we all felt a peaceful sense of 

There was too much gone over to discuss in a short article. Taking 
but one area of discussion, I'll list the group guidelines that 
were arrived at. This is something that each group needs to 
freshly originate in a meeting, or at the start of a series of 
meetings, rather that something that can effectively be externally 
imposed by others who have thought these things through. This is 
because the members of the current group need to go through the 
process of formulating the guidelines, so that they both clearly 
understand and strongly believe in the guidelines they come up 

The guidelines:

Everyone gets a chance to speak. No one talks too long; keep one's 
comments to a maximum of two minutes. Try to keep focused on the 
topic at hand. Hands are raised when you want to speak so that 
the group is aware of everyone wanting to speak. Defer the floor 
to someone who hasn't spoken in a long time, if you see their hand 
up. Jot down a note or two on the idea you want to say, so you 
don't have to rehearse your comments in your mind, crowding out 
what the person currently speaking is saying.

In talking, avoid putdowns. Don't attack people. Say what you 
think, but respect others. Try to start talking with your main 
point, and save the less important supporting arguments to later 
in your comments, so that if someone cuts in with another comment, 
you don't have to say "I need to keep talking, I haven't gotten to 
my main point yet."

When answering questions, keep the answer brief and responsive, 
keep focused, don't go off on tangents or lecture on unrelated 
points. Clarify the question, repeat what you understand was said, 
both so the person asking the question knows you understand it and 
so others in the room who may not hear the question can hear it 
from you. Be truthful in saying "I don't know," or "I'm not 
sure," if that's the case; don't pretend to know what you don't. 
After answering the question, ask the person "Did I answer you?"

The group could summarize ideas as the meeting progressed, perhaps 
noting them on large sheets of paper on the wall. The leadership 
of the meeting should be shared. Someone might run the *content* 
of the meeting, putting on or coordinating the study program, 
while someone else might monitor the *process* of the group, 
making sure everyone gets to speak, the group stays on topic, and 
other related tasks of hosting a healthy discussion or study 
class. There might be several people acting as process monitor 
during the meeting, perhaps taking 20 or 30 minute shifts.

The meeting brought to our attention how there are things that can 
be done in different and creative ways, things that allow for the 
creation of a strong sense of community and universal brotherhood, 
things that both bring a "spiritual sparkle" to a meeting as well 
as enhance the intellectual enthusiasm and rigor of the 
participants. We were left with the hope that there are things we 
can try that might help turn theosophical meetings into centers of 
heart-life that people might be attracted to, and benefit from, 
rather than what many groups have become, akin to a well gone dry, 
with rope and bucket, but no fresh waters to be found.


by H. T. Edge

[from THE THEOSOPHICAL PATH, August, 1911]

It has frequently been maintained that ancient nations, some of
whose art-works remain to us, knew secrets in metallurgy which
have been lost and not yet recovered by us; and that in this way
they were able to make bronze tools as hard as steel, or harder,
to make metals which would not corrode, etc. Where one has a
wish to prove that ancient races did not possess such knowledge,
there is a conflict between theories and facts, resulting in
attempts to find an explanation which will solve the dilemma. 
But where one has no reason for desiring to represent the
ancients as not being so endowed, the facts present no
difficulty. On the one hand we have monuments of the hardest
stone, elaborately engraved with deep and accurate intaglio. On
the other hand we know that many ancient civilizations were of
extremely long duration, and that surviving offshoots of these
great civilizations show a remarkable skill in many arts and
industries. There is an a priori probability that many processes
were known which have not yet been rediscovered; and the fact
that these architectural and sculptural remains exist merely
increases that probability.

With regard to incorruptible bronze, the following, which is
condensed from the Journal of the Royal Society of Arts
(Britain), is interesting.

Figures of the Buddha are found in the north of Siam in great
numbers, on the sites of ancient temples which have been
crumbling for centuries, leaving the figures standing amid the
forest trees. The interesting thing about these figures is the
perfect condition of the bronze after centuries of exposure to
tropical suns and rains.

The bronze is called by the natives "samrit" -- the perfect or
auspicious alloy -- and its composition for a long time remained a
secret, until, according to the American Consul at Bangkok, a few
years ago the formula was discovered in an old Siamese manuscript
belonging to the late King of Siam. The following is a

> Take twelve ticals (one tical is equal to one half-ounce
> avoirdupois) weight of pure tin, melt it at a slow fire, avoiding
> bringing it to red heat. Pour two ticals weight of quicksilver,
> stir until the latter has become thoroughly absorbed and
> amalgamated, then cast the mixture in a mold, forming it into a
> bar. Take one catty in weight (eighty ticals) of refined copper
> and melt it; then gradually incorporate with it the amalgam,
> keeping in the meantime the fused mass well stirred. When this
> has been done, throw into the crucible a sufficient quantity of
> ashes obtained from the stems of the bua-bok (lotus) creeper so
> as to cover the molten metal. Remove the dross with an iron
> ladle. The metal remaining is samrit bronze.

It is surely easy to understand that many such formulas might
have been known and never hit upon since. The possibilities in
the way of making alloys are endless, especially when it comes to
using ingredients or reagents other than metals. It would be
strange indeed if an industrious, highly intelligent, and very
patient people, working for ages, inspired by enthusiastic
motives, should not have discovered many things which are unknown
to us whose history is so recent and whose records have been so
largely concerned with less peaceful arts. 


by Sy Ginsburg

[based upon an February 20, 1995 posting to]

In November 1992, at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Miami, the Miami
Branch of the Theosophical Society sponsored Expo-92, a
metaphysical fair. There were many talks and workshops.

I happened to be giving one on Gurdjieff's teaching, and
afterward a young woman came up to me and said that she was
visiting Miami but lived in New York City. I asked her how she
became interested in these kinds of ideas.

She told me that about 5 years earlier, she was in Doubleday's
Book Store (an interesting name) in Manhattan, and that while she
was browsing, a book fell off a high shelf and hit her on the
head. She bent down and picked it up off the floor. The book
was P.D. Ouspensky, IN SEARCH OF THE MIRACULOUS. (For those
unfamiliar, this is the text most often used to present
Gurdjieff's teaching). She began to read that book and couldn't
put it down. She was hooked and has been on her quest ever
since. She was ready to be open to ideas of this kind.

Most of you who read this will know the feeling. How many of us
have had similar experiences! And how many like stories have we
heard! Your own story is probably no less extraordinary.

Of course there are Masters. I don't see them as embarrassing
deadweight at all. Jesus was one but he still had to be born and
live in a mundane body to accomplish something here. And I'll
bet he was subject to many weaknesses of the flesh. That doesn't
make him any less a Master. There are often good reasons for
advanced beings to take up physical body.

K. Paul deserves much credit for his important research, but if
Morya was the Maharajah of Kashmir that doesn't make him any less
a Master. And what of those incarnated as Blavatsky, Gurdjieff,
others! Who of us is high enough to sit in judgment of the level
of attainment of any of these extraordinary beings? And if they
smoked, drank, cursed or otherwise behaved badly in terms of our
contemporary morality so what. That makes them no less Masters.
They are Masters because they have mastered what we seek, and
maybe even mastered our hearts. They are further "ahead" on the
infinitely long path of return. They leave tracks on the path
for us to follow, but we each still need to tread that path

If we simply pay attention to the synchronicity all around us,
we easily find proof of discrete intelligence guiding us in our
quest. The more open we are to this guidance and the more
willing we are to serve others in their quest, the more obvious
this help is to us.

There is a tradition that esoteric ideas, ideas about
consciousness, are intentionally sewn into the fabric of ordinary
life by the advanced intelligence that guide us. These ideas are
embedded in monuments, in structures, in certain paintings, in
certain music, in certain dance, of course in literature. They
become mixed with the things of ordinary life. But when we, each
of us, begin to sift through and discover them, then further help
is given.

I like to collect stories about how people find their way onto
the spiritual path. One story is more extraordinary than the
next. Mine began when, as a tourist, I visited the Borobudur,
the vast Buddhist monument on the island of Java. I didn't know
anything about it at the time, didn't know anything about
theosophy, didn't know that it symbolized the seven
interpenetrating bodies, the lower quaternary and the upper
triad. But there was something about it that was unforgettable
and it left me with a lasting impression.

Only some years later when I was already a member of the
Theosophical Society and saw Geoffrey Hodson's book in which he
showed a painting of the permanently stationed angel that he was
able to see residing over the Borobudur, did I begin to
understand a little about this. There's more to the story, but
I'll stop here.


by Nancy B. Conley

[based an October 29, 1998 posting to]

In my most humble opinion, without a public events program which
in some way, consistently includes Theosophical Forums/Issues,
and a local organization which is structured so as to accommodate
(to a degree), new members, we will not be successful bringing in
new members. New Age programs bring in new age enthusiasts as
opposed to theosophical enthusiasts.

In the dozen years I've spent with the Theosophical Society in
Oakland, I have yet to see a member join because of public
programming reflective of theosophical perspectives.

It seems to always be peripheral issues, which may be the result
of presenting ourselves as an umbrella group which embraces many
philosophies as opposed to a group which has their own philosophy
and also respects the paths of others.

It appears to me that the current plan for theosophical groups in
the absence of good leadership and/or momentum towards a
grass-roots revival, is to find "cutsy" academic ways of playing
with words so as to make the teachings sound as though they are
coming from this era, but as it is done by folks who tend to be
academically oriented as opposed to metaphysically oriented, I
believe the real value of the teachings is being lost.

Further, these would be metaphysicians rely on their academic
experience to rewrite these teachings and seem almost
deliberately to word things in such a round about verbose manner
as to ensure that everyone reading their restatement of the
issues remains in a fog so that they likewise may remain in

The whole problem of relying on a charismatic leader as opposed
to finding a way to continue more "circularly" as a less
hierarchical group is that one person makes or breaks a group,
all the while their guts are sucked out.

If Christianity in general relied upon a second coming of their
"Christ" to unify, solidify, and streamline all the Christian
factions, what would become of the poor avatar attempting such a

The underlying issue being that if we can't find a way of working
as a more cohesive group in this day of electronic advantages,
and begin to build on our own internal abilities instead of
relying on external efforts, we will always be "crippled" in our
efforts. Remove all the alleged administrative "bullies" and ask
who and how will it be done differently? After all, if the
kingdom is within, so are the answers. 


by Eldon Tucker

[based upon a Januray 3, 1995 posting to]

In this note I will discuss some of the differences, as I
understand it, between the Besant/Leadbeater [BL] model of the
globes, planes, and principles, the Gupta Vidya model as
presented by Jerry Schueler [GS] (as I understand it), and the
model as I have presented it [ET].

Our physical earth has six invisible companions, each a
world in its own right. Including the earth, these seven
worlds are called Globes. They are in physical proximity to
each other, but being on differing planes, we cannot see the
seven at once. The seven together are called the Earth Chain.

Do the Globes have their own higher planes? When we speak
of going to the higher planes, are we going to the higher
planes of our Globe D earth?

[BL] Each Globe has its own higher planes. [ET/GS] When
we go to a higher plane, we are really on another of the
Globes; the Globes are the places on the different planes
where life can manifest itself.

> ... each one of these globes comprises or has seven
> lokas, or 'places', or worlds, or conditions, or states, or
> kinds, of matter--sub-worlds, if you like; and also seven
> talas ... these seven lokas on each globe are the fields of
> action of the ascending sub-waves in the racial cycles ... the
> various kinds of bodies ... that the race uses ... correspond
> in texture and senses with the various lokas passed through,
> and the loka which the evolving entity senses is that
> particular loka or world correspondent to its bodies.
> -- Purucker, FUNDAMENTALS, 394-5

In addition to the planes of existence, and the Globes of
our Earth Chain, there are various principles of
consciousness, including thought, desire, and sense
perception. How do these principles of consciousness fit in?

[BL/GS] They are bodies on higher planes. Thought, for
instance, comes from having a mental body, a body on the
mental plane. That body is our mind. [ET] They are the basic
ingredients of consciousness, of fully manifesting our lives
in a world. We take on all seven principles when coming into
existence on any one of the Globes, like the earth.

> The seven principles are not vehicles. They are not
> sheaths. ... They are principles when looked at from one point
> of view and elements when looked at from some other point of
> view. The vehicles, on the other hand, are aggregated centers
> or focuses or vortices in which the respective egos live, but
> these vortices, focuses, are in each case themselves all
> composed of the seven principles or elements.
> -- Purucker, DIALOGUES, II, 337

When do we visit the different Globes? How to we come
into existence on them and experience life on these different
earth worlds?

[BL/ET] We come into birth on any of the Globes through
the natural process of taking on a body and existence; except
for the Masters and exceptional individuals, we are not
embodied on the other Globes. [GS] We have already-existing
bodies on the Globes, and experience different kinds of
consciousness through their activities, including dream
consciousness through our Globe C & E bodies, etc.

[BL] In dreams, deep sleep, and in our typical visits to
higher planes, we are still on Globe D, on its higher planes.
[GS] Dreams are through visiting certain higher Globes, deep
sleep through still higher Globes, and so on. [ET] In sleep,
death, and Initiation, we pass through the higher Globes, but
don't come into full existence on them; we only take on the
higher principles on these globes, but not all the principles
through sense perception and a physical body.

> ... after the death on Earth the Monad passes to Globe
> E and there is a reimbodiment short or long as the case may be
> there. Then it passes to Globe F where the same thing takes
> place, governed by generally identic laws. Then it passes to
> Globe G ...
> -- Purucker, DIALOGUES, III, 248

We also read of different Egos or centers of consciousness within
us that we have developed.  What are they?

[BL] They are the bodies that we have developed on the
different planes. [GS] They are associated with the bodies
that we have developed on the different planes, with each Ego
associated with a different Globe of the Earth Chain. [ET]
They are different persistent centers of consciousness that we
have developed, with our having a different human Ego
evolved from within for each of the Globes that we visit, all
different expressions of the spiritual Ego, which expresses
itself through them.


by James Santucci

THOUGHT, vol. 9, no. 1, (Fall, 1990)]


It goes without saying that Mary Farrell Bednarowski, in her
article, "Outside the Mainstream: Women's Religion and Women
Religious Leaders in Nineteenth-Century America,"[1] deserves
credit for drawing scholars' attention to the high status of
women in nineteenth century non-mainstream religious movements.
Four of those are the subject of her research: Shakerism,
Spiritualism, Christian Science, and Theosophy. In her attempt
to answer the question of why women were and are more successful
in such groups, four possibilities were suggested:

> 1. a reinterpretation of the Christian theological positions by
>    de-emphasizing the Divine Being's masculine traits and gender
>    and
> 2. by de-emphasizing or denying the Doctrine of the Fall;
> 3. a rejection of the role of an ordained clergy;
> 4. an expansion of the role of women in society beyond marriage
>    and motherhood.

There is a problem, however, in ascertaining just what the proper
role these characteristics play in the movements in question. Do
they explain both the cause and effect of the status of women or
just the effect? If only the effect, then what is the cause? The
author is correct in seeing this as a "chicken-and-egg" problem,
but what is apparently evident regarding the Theosophical
Movement is the fact that there is no overwhelming evidence that
the position of women was somehow defined by the first three
characteristics given by Dr. Bednarowski.

The fourth characteristic--women's expanding roles in society--is
another story however: their expanded roles in the United States
began to evolve and develop many decades prior to these religious
movements.[2] Consequently, such a development will help to
explain the activism of one prominent woman theosophical leader
at the inception of the twentieth century. In general, however,
these four are not particularly well-suited in explaining the
role of women in Theosophy due to its international flavor; the
position of women therefore requires further inquiry and

A number of questions arise when comparing 'Theosophy' with Dr.
Bednarowski's thesis. First, what does she mean by Theosophy?
Second, if she is concerned with American women leaders, why does
she mention two women who are not products of American culture: a
Russian-born, albeit naturalized American citizen in her later
years (Helena Petrovna Blavatsky) and a British-born woman who
spent most of her later years in India (Annie Besant)? Thirdly,
just what are the historical facts concerning the role of women
leaders in the Theosophical Movement?

Regarding the first question, the term Theosophy is often used in
a rather nebulous manner. Many commentators, including Dr.
Bednarowski, connote the term with a specific organization: the
Theosophical Society, headquartered in Adyar, India. This is all
well and good, but it fails to take into account the many
dimensions of the Theosophical Movement. As I understand the
term, Theosophical Movement carries with it two connotations:
those theosophical societies that view Helena Blavatsky as the
main inspiration and genetrix of 'modern' Theosophy as defined
and formulated in her enormous literary output, especially those
books that stand out as masterpieces of occult lore, ISIS
UNVEILED and THE SECRET DOCTRINE[3]; secondly, what may be termed
Pre-Blavatskian Theosophy or Pre-Modern Theosophy.

Modern Theosophy not only includes the Theosophical Society, the
parent society founded in New York in the year 1875 (the
international headquarters established at Adyar in 1882) by
Blavatsky, Henry Steel Olcott, William Q. Judge, and others; it
also includes other organizations that ultimately derive from
this Society. In 1895, William Q. Judge, the vice-president of
the Adyar Society, withdrew his American Section from the Society
and established the Theosophical Society in America. After
Judge's death in 1896, Katherine Tingley assumed leadership that
same year and renamed the Society the Universal Brotherhood and
Theosophical Society. Shortly thereafter, in 1898, a break away
group from the Syracuse (N.Y.) Lodge of Judge's, now Tingley's,
Society under the leadership of William H. Dower and Mrs.
Francia A. LaDue formed the Temple of the People, which is now
located in Halcyon, not far from Pismo Beach, California.[4]

Two other groups developed from Mrs. Tingley's Society in that
same year: the Theosophical Society founded by Ernest T.
Hargrove, the former President of the Theosophical Society in
America who disputed Mrs. Tingley's claim to leadership, and the
Theosophical Society (Independent, New York), founded by Dr.
J.H. Salisbury and Donald Nicholson.[5] In 1909, still another
group established in Los Angeles as a reaction to Mrs. Tingley's
version of Theosophy was founded by a former member of her
Universal Brotherhood and Theosophical Society, Robert
Crosbie.[6] At present, The United Lodge, the Theosophical
Society (Adyar), and the Theosophical Society (Pasadena)
[formerly, The Theosophical Society in America and later the
Universal Brotherhood and Theosophical Society] are the three
main organizations that follow and disseminate Blavatsky's

In many of the major articles and books by H.P. Blavatsky, we
find innumerable references to a Theosophy that existed prior to
her own version of the teaching. This Pre-Modern Theosophy is
described by her as the "wisdom of the Ages" taught, preserved
and transmitted by such initiates in the ancient world as the
Buddha, Jesus, Pythagoras, Patańjali, Plato, Porphyry and
Proclus, sustained centuries later by such late Renaissance and
early modern philosophers as Giordano Bruno, Jacob Boehme,
Paracelsus, Agrippa, abiding in such diverse schools of
philosophy as the Greek Mystery Schools, the Vedānta,
Neo-Platonism, Taoism, and Cabalism, and embedded in the sacred
writings of the great historical religions of the world.[8]
Blavatsky's own theosophical ancestry, she claimed, was derived
from these sources and disclosed to the modern world with the
help of two spiritually advanced 'Masters' or 'Mahatmas' who made
her their special disciple or 'chela'.

To answer the first question, 'Theosophy' or 'Theosophical
Movement' will carry the restricted connotation that Dr.
Bednarowski gives it, except that I will include not only the
Theosophical Society (Adyar) but also the Theosophical Society
(Pasadena). Since the United Lodge of Theosophists follows a
policy of complete anonymity for both its members and leaders,
there is insufficient information concerning its organization.

Turning now to the second question, that of including women who
were neither raised in nor representative of American culture,
Dr. Bednarowski ignored the fact that although the Theosophical
Society was founded on American soil, it soon became
international in scope. Aside from its founding President, Henry
Steel Olcott, none of its subsequent leaders were American. This
was not the case of the Theosophical Society (Pasadena). Because
it is descended from the American Section of the Adyar T.S., its
membership is more American and its leadership has been and
remains exclusively American. Mindful of the fact that any
discussion on Modern Theosophy cannot ignore the largest
Theosophical Society, the Adyar T.S., this article therefore
cannot limit its discussion solely to American women leaders but
rather those leaders, American or not, who helped define a modern
Movement that has had considerable impact on the religious life
of the United States and abroad: Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, Annie
Besant, and Katherine Tingley.

Lastly, the third question that was raised, the historical
circumstances surrounding the role of women leaders in the
Theosophical Movement, will be discussed in the remainder of this
essay: first, by reviewing the origins of the Theosophical
Society and its objects prior to the schism in 1895; second, by
reviewing the role and contributions of the three leaders of both


The impetus surrounding the Theosophical Society's formation
serves as a telling comment on the reason for its origin. On the
evening of September 8, 1875, a Civil War veteran and mechanical
and civil engineer[9] by the name of George Henry Felt delivered
a lecture on "The Lost Canon of Proportion of the Egyptians."
According to accounts of the lecture from those present as well
as a Prospectus of the manuscript on which the lecture was based,
he claimed to have "discovered the true geometrical system of the
Egyptians, the long-lost and eagerly sought for key wherewith
Egypt unlocked the mysteries of Nature and Art." [10] Somehow
connected to the geometrical system of the Egyptians was the
accompanying discovery of elemental or original spirits that
could be conjured and even controlled by the Egyptian initiate

These claims, especially the theurgic claim of Felt's, induced
Olcott [12] to suggest the establishment of a society devoted to
the "study and elucidation" [13] of occultism, the Kaballa
(Cabala), and related topics. The by-laws that were composed
shortly thereafter [l4] reflect this interest in its statement on
the objects of the newly formed Theosophical Society: "to collect
and diffuse a knowledge of the laws which govern the universe."
These events suggest two conclusions:

> 1. Olcott appears to have been more interested in the
> subordinate issue of the theurgic claims of Felt rather than his
> more substantial philosophical and mathematical presentation of
> the "Law of Proportions";
> 2. the society was founded on the premise that it be an
> investigative society, not a religious body.

The first observation is important because it suggests one of the
two overriding approaches to the 'hidden laws of nature', the
occult, that drew individuals into the Theosophical Movement in
general. The first and perhaps historically the more popular of
the two may be termed the 'technological', 'phenomenal',
manipulative' employment of the occult: that is, the attempt to
demonstrate the reality of the occult in much the same way that
Felt promised to do so in his initial presentation.[15] The
second, which might be termed 'theoretical' or 'philosophical'
Theosophy, sought to decipher, decode, and unravel the hidden
laws of the cosmos as well as its underlying essence. To a
considerable degree, Madame Blavatsky herself reflected both
attitudes, especially in her early writings, before becoming
preponderantly theoretical in her later work. The Adyar Society
during the years of Mrs. Besant's Presidency, however, moved in
the opposite direction by emphasizing 'technological' Theosophy.
This explains in large part the Neo-Theosophy of C.W. Leadbeater
and Mrs. Besant and the inclusion of the Liberal Catholic Church
and the Krishnamurti messianic movement into the Society.

The second observation given above is strikingly reminiscent of a
body of like-minded individuals intent on investigating a
particular object, in this case the occult. Thus it took on the
semblance, at least at the time of its inception, of an
organization not unlike that of the subsequent Society of
Psychical Research.[16] Furthermore, the structure of the by-laws
were in all probability modeled after those of a private male
social club not unlike the one in which Olcott himself was a
member, the Lotus Club of New York. This early phase of the
Society, however, was short-lived. The Society took on more of a
philosophical, or better, an ideological rather than a scientific
stance reflecting another institution that was male dominated,
Freemasonry. A review of the origins of the Theosophical Society
does not warrant the assumption that women were attracted to the
Society at its inception because of the doctrine of Brotherhood.
This teaching was obviously non-existent; furthermore, a stated
above, the Society reflected the organization and attitude of an
exclusively male institution. The question remains, then, as to
what induced women to join prior to the introduction of the
notion of Brotherhood as an object of the Society.


The object of the Society that was quoted by Dr. Bednarowski as
a principal factor in attracting women to the Adyar Society
received its final revision in 1896, twenty-one years after the
Society's inauguration. It reads as follows:

> To form a nucleus of the Universal Brotherhood without
> distinction of race, creed, sex, caste or colour.

Although introduced a few years after the Society was founded, it
has since developed into the single most important object of the
Society. Its origins, however, are not as clear as one would
expect. It appears that the first mention of 'Brotherhood'
appears in an information sheet entitled "The Theosophical
Society: Its Origin, Plan and Aims". Composed in early 1878 and
ready for distribution on May 3rd of that year, the principal
author of the circular, Henry Steel Olcott, wrote that one of the
objects of the Society, indeed its main object, was

> to aid in the institution of a Brotherhood of Humanity wherein
> all good and pure men, of every race, shall recognize each other
> as the equal effects (upon this planet) of one Uncreated,
> Universal, Infinite, and Everlasting Cause. [17]

By early 1879, the title of the Society was known as "The
Theosophical Society or Universal Brotherhood" with one of its
objects being "to promote a feeling of brotherhood among
nations."[18] Such an interest arose, at least partially, with
the establishment of an alliance with the Arya Samaj, a Neo-Hindu
organization established in 1875 by Swami Dayananda Sarasvati
that considered the Veda the fount of Truth.[19] The alliance of
a Western religio-philosophical organization with an Indian
non-Christian and even anti-Christian society would be regarded
with acrimony at the time.[20] Consequently, it is little wonder
that a related object listed in the 1879 Rules was "to oppose and
counteract bigotry in every form, whether as an intolerant
religious sectarianism or belief in miracles or anything
supernatural." Three revisions of the rules took place over the
next three years [21] with the last, in early 1882, serving as
the direct antecedent to the final 1896 revision: "to form the
nucleus of a Universal Brotherhood of Humanity, without
distinction of race, creed, or colour." [22] The penultimate
revision took place in 1888 adding to the above "without
distinction of race, creed, sex, caste or colour." [23] What the
immediate cause was to induce the authors to expand the list is
not clear, but there can be no doubt that with the
internationalization of the Society in terms of general
membership came a growing awareness of the importance of
universal applicability of the idea of equality. This growing
awareness is further reflected in the revision of this object.
Furthermore, there seems to have occurred a cross-fertilization
of the general theme of equality in the works of Edward Bellamy,
especially his best-selling utopian novel, LOOKING BACKWARD. The
publication of this book in 1887, advocating a cooperative rather
than a competitive society, in other words a version of
Socialism, induced many theosophists to consider him a true
theosophist. Although not a member of the Society[24], his
works, including "The Blindman's World" and "To Whom This May
Come", not only caused considerable excitement In the
theosophical arena[25] but also induced two theosophists to
consider him a true theosophist. Although not a member of the
Society [24], his works, including "The Blindman's World" and "To
Whom This May Come", not only caused considerable excitement in
the theosophical arena [25] but also induced two theosophists,
Cyrus Field Willard and Sylvester Baxter, to establish the first
Nationalistic Club, with the Nationalist movement subsequently
becoming a popular phenomenon in the late 1880's and 90's.[26]
Theosophists also dominated the journal of the movement, THE
NATIONALIST; in fact, no less a figure than Abner Doubleday, a
vice-president and for a short time the President of the T.S.,
joined a Nationalist Club.[27] The connection of the two
organizations was made explicit in the declaration of the
Principles of the Nationalist Clubs: "The principle of the
Brotherhood of Humanity is one of the eternal truths that govern
the world's progress on lines which distinguish human nature from
brute nature."[28]

It would be clear that the continued revisions and clarification
to the statement on Brotherhood as an object of the T.S. and its
emphasis in the Nationalist movement bear out Dr. Bednarowski's
contention that it was an important factor in attracting many
women to the Society, at least from the mid 1880's on.[29] It is
important, however, to keep in mind that Brotherhood was not only
a social or egalitarian ideal; it also referred to a fundamental
philosophical principle that embodied one very important
characteristic of the pre-modern Theosophical Movement, namely,
that an interconnectedness existed between the micro- and
macro-cosm. This was first expressed in its modern version in
the New York Circular of 1978 and was given its classical
expression in the third of THE SECRET DOCTRINE[30]:

> The fundamental identity of all souls with the universal
> Over-Soul, the latter being itself an aspect of the Unknown Root;
> and the obligatory pilgrimage for every Soul--a spark of the
> former -through the Cycle of Incarnation (or "Necessity") in
> accordance with Cyclic and Karmic law. . .

The relationship of the divine and the human, therefore, was
expressed not through metaphysical terminology but through a term
that was made popular by the French Revolution: 'fraternity'.
What is of importance is that the metaphysical definition of
Brotherhood served as the basis for its sociological expression.
Furthermore, the latter cannot be associated with any form of
socialism or egalitarianism. As attractive as Bellamy's version
of this form of Brotherhood was, Blavatsky made it clear that it
was not perfect because of the continued presence of selfishness.
Rather, it is in the Christian and Buddhist writings that one
witnesses perfect, altruistic equality or socialism.[31] The
attraction to Theosophy, therefore, was and is associated with
metaphysical and social Brotherhood, not simply the latter as
suggested by Bednarowski.

If Brotherhood was an important factor in the recruitment of
women members from the mid-1880's on, the motivating factor
prior to this period appears to have been Spiritualism, a
movement primarily initiated by women and in which they played a
very influential role.[32] Modern Spiritualism dates back to 1848
when 'proof' of survival after death was first demonstrated at
the Hydesville home of John and Margaret Fox, where their
daughters Catherine and Margaretta, devised a means of
communicating with a purported spirit. Over the years,
Spiritualism had its ups and downs in popularity, but it is clear
that during the 1870's it was extremely popular. No less a
figure than Alfred R. Wallace, the naturalist who developed a
theory of evolution based on natural selection and himself a
Spiritualist, estimated that as of 1874 there were from eight to
eleven million Spiritualists in the U.S. alone.[33] He also
reported that the number of practicing American mediums at the
time to be about 200, many of whom were women[34] and most, if
not all, of these women to be advocates of women's rights.[35]

Spiritualism afforded women a means of escape from the confines
of the home by allowing them to develop their powers of
mediumship, a profession that was considered to be decidedly
feminine.[36] Keeping in mind that the Theosophical Society arose
at least partially out of the Spiritualist Movement, it is little
wonder that women were involved from the very beginning. The
"formers" of the Society included a number of prominent
Spiritualists: Henry J. Newton, the President of the First
Society of Spiritualists in New York; Mrs. Emma Hardinge Britten
and Charles Carleton Massey, both prominent English
Spiritualists; and the principal founders, Madame Blavatsky and
Colonel Olcott. Furthermore, the number of women in the
Theosophical Society from 1875 to the end of 1876, at a time when
it was fairly elitist in makeup, is significant. Of the 85
members admitted, 17 were women, a significant representation at
the time.



   1980): 207-231.

   Oxford University Press, 1980).

3. I am mindful that the letters of the Masters of Wisdom (the
   Mahatmas) to A.P. Sinnett, an early theosophical writer and
   leader, and the writings of William Q. Judge have an
   important place in Modern Theosophy, but the writings of
   Blavatsky are universally accepted and studied, which is not
   necessarily the case for the above. The publications in
   question are THE MAHATMA LETTERS [21], transcribed, compiled,
   and within an introduction by A.T. Barker (London: Rider and
   Company, 1926) and W.Q. Judge's AN OCEAN OF THEOSOPHY
   (Pasadena, CA.: Theosophical University Press, 1964).

4. Hine, Robert V., CALIFORNIA'S UTOPIAN COLONIES, (Berkeley,
   CA.: University of California Press, 1983): 53. [Originally
   published in 1953.] Anonymous, THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT:
   1875-1950 (Los Angeles: The Cunningham Press, 1951): 302;
   THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT (Berkeley, CA.: University of California
   Press, 1980): 158.

   WISDOM REVIVED: 135-36; Emmett A. Greenwalt, CALIFORNIA
   UTOPIA: POINT LOMA: 1897-1942, Second edition (San Diego, CA.:
   Point Loma Publications, Inc., 1978):

6. Crosbie was a Boston Theosophist who left the headquarters of
   the Universal Brotherhood at Point Loma in 1904. See THE

7. Other societies that are or were directly related to Modern
   Theosophy include The Independent Theosophical Society of
   America (Chicago), founded by Celestia Root Lang in 1914 and
   the Blavatsky Association (London), which boasted several
   prominent former members of the Adyar T.S., including Alice
   Leighton Cleather and William Kingsland. See the O.K.
   LIBRARY CRITIC (Washington, D.C.), vol. 14, no. 18: 4.
   There are also a number of organizations that have expanded or
   built upon Blavatsky's Theosophy and so deserve to be placed
   in the Theosophical Movement: the Quest Society (London)
   founded in 1913 by G.R.S. Mead, the Arcane School of Alice
   Bailey, and Carl Louis van Grasshopf's (aka Max Heindel)
   Rosicrucian Fellowship, which is presently located in
   Oceanside, California.

8. For sources see James A. Santucci, THEOSOPHY AND THE
   THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY (London: The Theosophical History Center,
   1987): 2 and accompanying notes.

9. According to his death certificate, Felt was a mechanical
   engineer; in the 1895-6 Manhattan city telephone directory, he
   is listed as a civil engineer.

10. The manuscript containing the result of this research was
    supposed to have been published in the form of a rather large
    tome by the publisher J.W. Bouton under the title THE
    Judging from some of the comments contained in the
    Prospectus, it was eagerly awaited because of the rather
    exciting discoveries thought to have been contained therein. 
    For some reason, the manuscript was never published and is
    nowhere to be found.

     Henry Steel Olcott, OLD DIARY LEAVES, volume I (New York and
     London: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1895): 126-131. Therein is
     reproduced a letter of George Felt to the LONDON
     SPIRITUALIST dated June 19, 1878 that details his version of
     the lecture and circumstances surrounding it.

12. This is the accepted version of the foundation of the
    Society. Twenty years after its formation, another member of
    the original group who was present at the meeting where it
    was proposed, Henry J. Newton, suggested that he, Newton,
    was the individual responsible for proposing its formation. 
    This is detailed in "The Real Origin of the Theosophical
    Society" by Questor Vitae in LIGHT (November 23, 1895: 569
    and continued in the November 30, 1895 issue: 577). Still
    another version was related by Mrs. Besant in her "Speeding
    the Message", LUCIFER (London), vol. 12, no. 68 (April 15,
    1893): 105 "She [H.P.B.] told me herself how her Master bade
    her found it [the T.S.], and how at His bidding she wrote the
    suggestion of starting it on a slip of paper and gave it to
    W.Q. Judge to pass to Colonel Olcott. . .'

13. Minutes of the September 8, 1875 meeting.

14. "Preamble and By-Laws of the Theosophical Society" (October
    30, 1875).

15. In the Preamble of the "Preamble and By-Laws of the
    Theosophical Society", this is emphasized: The title of the
    Theosophical Society explains the objects and desires of its
    founders: they seek "to obtain knowledge of the nature and
    attributes of the Supreme Power and of the higher spirits by
    the aid of physical processes." In other words, they hope,
    that by going deeper than modern science has hitherto done,
    into the esoteric philosophies of ancient times, they may be
    enabled to obtain, for themselves and other investigators,
    proof of the existence of an "unseen Universe," the nature of
    its inhabitants, if such there be, and laws which govern them
    and their relations with mankind. (5)

16. This is reflected in Olcott's early fascination with
    Spiritualist phenomena. In 1874, he investigated one such
    case at the Eddy homestead in Chittenden, Vermont and printed
    his observations in the NEW YORK DAILY GRAPHIC in a series of
    articles that first appeared in the September 29, 1874
    edition. A subsequent publication originated from these
    articles, entitled PEOPLE FROM THE OTHER WORLD (Rutlan,
    Vermont Charles E. Tuttle, 1972.

17. The circular is printed in H.P. BLAVATSKY: COLLECTED
    WRITINGS: 1874-1878, volume one, edited by Boris de Zirkoff
    (Wheaton, ILL.: The Theosophical Press, 1966): 375.

18. "The Theosophical Society: Address delivered by Col. H.S
    Olcott, President Theosophical Society, At the Framji Cowasji
    Hall, Bombay on March 23rd, 1879 Together with the Rules of
    the Society (Bombay: Printed at the Industrial Press, 1879). 
    The object quoted appears in Section VIII.e (p. iii).

19. On the association of the T.S. with the Arya Samaj, see
    (Wheaton, IL.: The Theosophical Printing House [Quest Book],
    1987): 13, 162-169. See also Mary Neff, PERSONAL MEMOIRS OF
    H.P. BLAVATSKY (Wheaton, 111. The Theosophical Publishing
    House, 1967 [a Quest Book; first published in 1937]: 260.

20. See "The Arya Samaj" by Helena P. Blavatsky, in H.P.
    BLAVATSKY COLLECTED WRITINGS, 1: 379-384 [originally
    published in the June 2, 1878 issue of the New York ECHO].

21. In 1880, the third object of the T.S. was "to gradually
    form the nucleus of a Brotherhood of Humanity, or Universal
    Brotherhood, of which each member joining might in time of
    need and according to his deserts, be helped by all and help
    in his turn, as a brother would another brother" ("The
    Theosophical Society: The Revised Rules of the Society"
    [Bombay, 1880]). On February 17, 1881, the first object was
    "to form the nucleus of a universal Brotherhood of Humanity,
    the obvious philanthropic value of which must be beyond
    dispute, while the esoteric significance of a union formed on
    that plan, is conceived by the founders, for reasons derived
    from a study of Oriental Philosophy, to be of great
    importance." ("The Rules of the Theosophical Society"
    [Allahabad: Pioneer Press, 1881].

22. "A Report of the Proceedings of a Public Meeting Held at the
    Framji Cowasji Institute, Bombay, on the 12th of January,
    1882 to celebrate the Sixth Anniversary of the Theosophical
    Society" (Bombay, 1882).

23. Underline mine. Supplement to the Theosophist: General
    Report of the Thirteenth Convention and Anniversary of the
    Theosophical Society.

    York: King's Crown Press, 1945). The author does mention
    that Bellamy's brother, Charles, was a member (p. 33).

25. Ibid., 29-33.

    Greenwood Press, 1981 [Contributions in American Studies,
    Number 55]: 172.

27. Ibid.; Walter La Feber and Richard Polenberg, THE AMERICAN
    CENTURY (New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1975): 14. 
    Compare too H.P. Blavatsky, THE KEY TO THEOSOPHY (Pasadena,
    CA.: Theosophical University Press, 1972) [reprint of the
    original edition of 1889]: 44-5.

28. Blavatsky, THE KEY TO THEOSOPHY: 45. Blavatsky stressed the
    similarities of the T.S. and the Nationalists in very
    explicit terms. Reference is also made in THE THEOSOPHICAL
    MOVEMENT: 76.

29. It may not have been an important factor in Katherine
    Tingley's decision in joining the T.S. as will be shown
    below. It certainly was for Annie Besant, however.

    SCIENCE, RELIGION, AND PHILOSOPHY. Two volumes in one (Los
    Angeles: The Theosophy Company, 1974 [originally published in
    1888]): 17.

31. H.P. Blavatsky, THE KEY TO THEOSOPHY: 44, 79.

32. R. Laurence Moore, "The Spiritualist Medium: A Study of
    Female Professionalism in Victorian America", AMERICAN
    QUARTERLY, XXVII/2 (May, 1975): 200-221. My thanks to Karen
    Lystra for bringing this article to my attention. One recent
    publication on the subject is RADICAL SPIRITS: SPIRITUALISM
    Braude (New York: Beacon Press, 1989).

33. "A Defense of Modern Spiritualism", RELIGIO-PHILOSOPHICAL
    JOURNAL (July 18, 1874): 1 (reprinted from the LONDON
    FORTNIGHTLY REVIEW, May, 1874). This figure was based on the
    opinion of Judge John Edmonds, a former Chief Justice of the
    New York Supreme Court. Wallace also added that most
    Spiritualists were not members of Spiritualist organizations;
    they were, rather, mainline Christians. Of the Spiritualist
    organizations, Wallace reported that as of 1870, there were
    20 State Associations, and 105 Societies of Spiritualists.

34. Bednarowski (215) mentions the BANNER OF LIGHT (April 15,
    1876) printing a list of about 300 mediums, 127 of which were


36. Moore, "The Spiritualist Medium": 202f. Many Spiritualists
    were even antagonistic to marriage and the family
    (Bednarowski: 215-6), most likely contributing to the
    increased number of divorces in the 1870's and 1880's
    AMERICA (Chicago, 1969) and quoted in Degler: 326f.


by Ray Tomes 

(Oct 1998)

Coming from a scientific background and working in computers it
was not surprising that I became involved in making computer
models to try and predict future economic trends for businesses
so that they might better plans things. However it was not at
all obvious where this would eventually lead and that it would
bring together interests in cosmology and the theory of music as
well and eventually re-awaken an interest in things more

My computer models used mathematical techniques to try and use
the present state of the economy, seen as a dynamic system, to
predict the momentum of its movement forward. What was clear in
my analysis was that there where definitely cycles present and
that seeing things in this physical way could help to explain
that. Because cycles kept jumping out of my data at me I began
to look for them in ernest and found that cycles of 4.45, 5.9,
7.15 and about 8.9 years were present in many economic variables. 
I used these successfully for a while before noticing that all of
these periods were almost exactly fractions of a period of 35.6
years. That was interesting because other cycles that were
subsequently found also tended to fit the pattern.

Then I realized that these four periods were related as
frequencies in the proportions 4:5:6:8 and that this was exactly
the proportion of frequencies in a major chord in music! Also,
some shorter period cycles that were found in commodity prices
had the same frequency relationship to each other as all the
white notes on the piano plus a couple of black notes.

At the time I thought this was too weird to tell people about in
case they thought I was a crazy. Then I learned of the
Foundation for the Study of Cycles and made a visit to their
offices in the US. There in print were the discoveries of Edward
Dewey who had reported cycles based on multiples and fractions of
17.75 years and including 35.5, 8.88, 5.92 and 4.44 years. His
ratios were mainly 2 and 3, exactly as found in music as
discovered by Pythagoras thousands of years ago.

Dewey had used different data, from different times and different
countries but found the same cycles present. Like me, but before
me, he had also suspected a connection to cosmic cycles. I had
long noticed that Jupiter's period around the Sun of 11.86 years
was accurately 1/3 of my 35.6 year period.

Over the following years I gradually found out about longer
cycles and realized that the pattern went on to longer and longer
periods and was a universal law. After several false starts I
found the means by which to calculate, from a very simple axiom,
the whole pattern of cycles that were found. That axiom is:

> The universe began as a single wave which, because of a
> non-linearity in the wave equation, produces harmonics, and each
> of these produced harmonics does the same.

A harmonic simply means a cycle that has a frequency that is a
multiple of the original, or a period that is an exact fraction.

When the maths of this axiom are fully developed it produces not
only the major chord of music, but also the whole scale including
the extra subtle notes found in Indian music and indicates the
importance of numbers such as 12 and 24 and other proportions
found in ancient ideas including astrology and many religions.

More than that, it predicted that very strong harmonics should
occur at ratios near powers of 34560 from the size of the
universe. When we take the size of the universe and divide
repeatedly by 34560 then the resulting values turn out to be good
estimates for the distances between galaxies, stars, planets,
moons, ... cells, atoms, nucleons and maybe quarks. The
predicted sizes of atoms and nucleons are within a few percent of
the observed sizes.

The predicted pattern fitted accurately with many things, from
geological cycles of many millions of years and the quantisation
of galaxy redshifts to the commonness of isotopes and even the
correct predicion of a new atomic particle in 1994.

What this shows is that everything that exists in the universe is
a harmonic of a single universal wave and that there is only one
law that governs the entire cosmos.

Because harmonics divide both space and time in the same
proportions it is not surprising that they also divide other
derivatives of these. Velocity is just distance/time and it is
also the case that the velocity of various waves follows the same
pattern. The speed of light in different substances tend to be
musical proportions from the speed of light in vacuum, e.g. in
water it is almost exactly 3/4 of in vacuum. Also, the speed of
sound makes a similar pattern but at about 1/34560 of the speed
of light and the speed of heat is correspondingly slower again.

The density of different states of matter follows 34560^3 ratios
because volume is the cube of linear dimension. We find that
neutron stars are about 34560^3 or 10^13 more dense than ordinary
matter and that the universe as a whole is about (34560^3)^2 less

The three sets of speeds of waves and the various densities began
to make me think that perhaps mind and spirit are the more
rarified waves that the theory predicts. There would also be
many sublevels, because the 34560 ratio is only the strongest
ratio but many others of 2, 3, 4, 12 and the musical ratios 3/2,
4/3, 9/8 etc occur. This seems like it might well fit to the
theosophical ideas concerning the planes of existence and the
divisions of these into matter-mind-spirit and further
subdivisions to subtle body and sublevels of mind and so on.

It was clear to me that a single medium, or ether, could be
understood to underlie all phenomena. Although the idea of the
ether was abandoned in science during this century I began to
understand that the reasons for this were based on very subtle
logical mistakes. Correction of these mistakes could allow
gravity and electromagnetism to be understood as aspects of the
same thing and to begin to unify physics and even indicate how
physics and spirituality might coexist.

Having got connected to internet in 1994 I found that there
existed other people who were thinking along similar lines
concerning an ether and physics ideas. The only other material
that I have found relating to the harmonics theory are ancient
ones, such as Hindu, Buddhist and some other cultures. Internet
is a wonderful tool for tiny percentages of the population to
find each other and carry on a dialog.

In 1997, with a friend in the US, we organized a conference to
discuss various ideas in fundamental physics and cosmology that
were outside the main stream and revisiting the ideas that we
considered where abandoned through errors that were made earlier
this century. I manage several discussion groups and web rings
concerning these matters and have lots of material on the web
relating to cycles.

This year I learned vipassana meditation (the technique
discovered by the Buddha) and experienced at first hand the
existence of the subtle body and eventually the waves that pass
through us all the time. I also joined the local Theosophical
Society and have begun to read the material available and to see
that my ideas make many connections with theosophical knowledge.

My personal home page and has material relating to cycles and
physics is at: 

The story of the harmonics theory in greater detail is at: 

The home page for the cycles email list for matters relating to
cycles in anything and everything: 

The home page for the Alexandria eGroup list which discusses
ancient and modern ideas combining science, music, history and

The Boundaries of Science web ring which is a set of sites
concerned with expanding the base of science into new areas,
including some with an understanding of the spiritual is: 

The Alexandria Foundation which co-ordinates a number of these
activities including the above mentioned conference. 

And information about Vipassana meditation and its rapid growth
in recent years around the world including sites where courses
are available is contained at: 


by H. T. Edge

[from THE THEOSOPHICAL PATH, August, 1911]

It has frequently been maintained that ancient nations, some of
whose art-works remain to us, knew secrets in metallurgy which
have been lost and not yet recovered by us; and that in this way
they were able to make bronze tools as hard as steel, or harder,
to make metals which would not corrode, etc. Where one has a
wish to prove that ancient races did not possess such knowledge,
there is a conflict between theories and facts, resulting in
attempts to find an explanation which will solve the dilemma. 
But where one has no reason for desiring to represent the
ancients as not being so endowed, the facts present no
difficulty. On the one hand we have monuments of the hardest
stone, elaborately engraved with deep and accurate intaglio. On
the other hand we know that many ancient civilizations were of
extremely long duration, and that surviving offshoots of these
great civilizations show a remarkable skill in many arts and
industries. There is an a priori probability that many processes
were known which have not yet been rediscovered; and the fact
that these architectural and sculptural remains exist merely
increases that probability.

With regard to incorruptible bronze, the following, which is
condensed from the Journal of the Royal Society of Arts
(Britain), is interesting.

Figures of the Buddha are found in the north of Siam in great
numbers, on the sites of ancient temples which have been
crumbling for centuries, leaving the figures standing amid the
forest trees. The interesting thing about these figures is the
perfect condition of the bronze after centuries of exposure to
tropical suns and rains.

The bronze is called by the natives "samrit" -- the perfect or
auspicious alloy -- and its composition for a long time remained a
secret, until, according to the American Consul at Bangkok, a few
years ago the formula was discovered in an old Siamese manuscript
belonging to the late King of Siam. The following is a

> Take twelve ticals (one tical is equal to one half-ounce
> avoirdupois) weight of pure tin, melt it at a slow fire, avoiding
> bringing it to red heat. Pour two ticals weight of quicksilver,
> stir until the latter has become thoroughly absorbed and
> amalgamated, then cast the mixture in a mold, forming it into a
> bar. Take one catty in weight (eighty ticals) of refined copper
> and melt it; then gradually incorporate with it the amalgam,
> keeping in the meantime the fused mass well stirred. When this
> has been done, throw into the crucible a sufficient quantity of
> ashes obtained from the stems of the bua-bok (lotus) creeper so
> as to cover the molten metal. Remove the dross with an iron
> ladle. The metal remaining is samrit bronze.

It is surely easy to understand that many such formulas might
have been known and never hit upon since. The possibilities in
the way of making alloys are endless, especially when it comes to
using ingredients or reagents other than metals. It would be
strange indeed if an industrious, highly intelligent, and very
patient people, working for ages, inspired by enthusiastic
motives, should not have discovered many things which are unknown
to us whose history is so recent and whose records have been so
largely concerned with less peaceful arts. 


by John Crocker

[based upon a October 3, 1998 posting to]
When an old Indian first agreed to show me a few things about
weather, about wind and plants and animals, he told me I needed
to learn how to listen. He told me that people had such
continually noisy minds that almost no one was able to actually
hear anything in the world. He didn't think people actually paid
ATTENTION to each other, let alone anything else in the world
around them. That they were even unable to spend many minutes
alone in their own minds ... preferring to have continual
noise, TV, radio, stereo, anything in the background rather than
be stuck in silence with themselves. That even when they were
wide-awake people existed in something resembling a dream state.

So the actual way I was supposed to learn how to listen (and the
idea appealed to me because it just sounded so damn creative) was
to do what he called "hearing a day" -- to go into the mountains,
sit under a tree somewhere, and remain wide awake, and
motionless, for 24 hours. He bet me I couldn't do it. He also
told me not to bother trying to BS him -- cause he'd KNOW if I
managed to do it. I didn't know what he was talking about -- how
hard could such a thing be?

I started around noon one day ... after little more than
three hours I was almost going nuts. My mind was racing and I
came up with a hundred excuses why what I was doing was stupid,
and almost just got up and blew the whole thing off. After four
or five hours though, things kinda settled down, and I started
getting really -- well, QUIET inside. Started to get a little
about what he was talking about. And once I was no longer
blurred by my own thoughts, a sort of veil lifted -- and I
started really noticing the world, to notice the immense number
of subtle changes that were happening during the course of the
The way the plants changed their mood as evening approached. I
watched a hawk hunting field mice. After a while I noticed that
the place where I was sitting had accepted my presence ... 
and things that generally scatter and hide at the approach of
humans started accepting me as no more important than part of the
tree. Little animals scurried around.
A small herd of deer crossed a path less than 50 feet away --
noticing me, but not as a threat. And then I hit the Zone --
total silence inside -- watched night descend with its own
rhythm. I heard the huge transition between day-life and
nightlife. In this transition, many animals quieted down at
night, and many others awoke. I started feeling a whole global
range of sensation -- perception became three-dimensional ... 
the sun didn't "rise and set" ... the EARTH revolved, and I
swear I FELT myself sitting on a round globe, and FELT its
rotation in almost a visceral way.

I heard wind, but not as it AFFECTS the sound of rustling leaves,
but rather felt it as masses of air moving through the thick
atmosphere, like bubbles in a stream.

Almost fell asleep a few times, but managed to stay awake even in
the dead of night. Noticed this one place, just before dawn's
first approach, when even the night sounds had ceased -- and it
was totally silent, time seemed to stop. I could not tell where
I stopped and the world started. But there was almost a palpable
feeling of -- well, of a new day GATHERING itself. And then,
before the sky had even begun to lighten, I heard what had to be
one of the most remarkable and beautiful sounds in the world: The
first chirp of a morning bird. Just one single note in the
center of a vast silence. And then all hell broke loose -- the
next hour felt like someone had turned a computer on, and an
immeasurably large operating system was initializing its systems
and booting its kernal.
Species after species woke up, started making noises, started
interacting with others. The plants changed. The air changed,
and when the first ray of sunlight finally hit the side of my
face I FELT it as a physical object. By the time noon came
around, as tired and hungry as I was, it was very difficult to
leave. There was SO much that was still revealing itself to me
-- SO much about the world, and the life living on it, that I had
been so totally unaware of. It felt like I could just sit there
for days and still only be understanding but the barest bit of
what I had always just taken for granted. That day permanently
changed not only my relationship with the natural world -- but,
as I went about my life, changed how I heard people too.

In fact, the next day, going to work, going out with friends
afterwards, I was almost stunned at how very much I had been
oblivious to. Noticed that with just a little center of silence
inside -- the equivalent of an inner "ear" ... that people
could not HELP but expose their entire selves, their true
intentions, with every word they spoke -- even if the words (as
words so often are) were spoken to deliberately mask those very
things -- from others as well as from themselves. Like there is
some wholly different level of life and experience, hidden but
very real, that is continually going on underneath modern
civilization -- indeed, that civilization floats on as a small
boat on a large ocean.
My entire judgement of people changed. Some people that I had
never noticed I suddenly discovered were AWARE of this layer. 
Some that looked wholly unremarkable, upon hearing their voices,
I understood to be exceedingly rare and magnificent at heart. 
Some that seemed weak were suddenly understood to be powerful --
others that had great apparent power ... in business, in
society ... exposed themselves for being almost hollow
inside, like but a few simple words could collapse their entire
foundations. Few understood themselves in either direction. 
There were many brilliant souls who had no idea they were
brilliant, and many who were empty and undeveloped inside who
thought themselves the greatest thing on earth.
But a few ... a rare few ... were REALLY remarkable. 
They UNDERSTOOD. They knew and ACKNOWLEDGED where their stars
shone, and knew and acknowledged where their gems still needed
polishing. No one could convince them that they were more than
they were -- but no one could convince them they were less. And
this seemed to have nothing to do with age, class, race, social
status or wealth. These few seem to be scattered through the
entire vast fabric of humanity, like gemstones sewn randomly into
a large quilt.

The other thing that day gave me was an appreciation for religion
and philosophy. At the root of all of it, I think, is a person
or persons that entered the Silence, and heard the world -- heard
its enormity, its vastness, its diversity -- and tried to put it
into words, tried to name it, tried to express it to those who
had not heard it in a way that would allow them an entrance into
Having heard but the barest fraction of it, I at least won the
gift of being able to appreciate those whose listening had
extended over years, who had entered it deeply and passed through
portal after portal on that interior path, an appreciation for
those centuries old traditions that had accumulated the work and
insights of countless nameless adventurers in that amazing
interiority -- as someone who has tried to paint with oils . . 
. even if they are not particularly good ... can understand
the paintings of masters, the skill, the nuances, in an entirely
different way.
While FOLLOWERS of traditions, STUDENTS of those writings, will
focus heavily on the knowledge aspect of things ... the
FOUNDERS themselves would NEVER say that the writings -- the
concepts -- have any importance at all in and of themselves. 
They would never claim that they had done anything other than
faintly hint at the actuality of that immensity. They would
never try to claim that what they wound up writing and saying was
not minuscule in relation to what they did not, and COULD NOT
say. And were you to ask them how THEY would want their writings
used, I think that most of them would say the following ...

What the Founders Would Say

Do not bother yourselves about understanding the LETTER of my
words, for that is only my own small self, rather try, try with
all your heart and soul, to catch the SPIRIT behind them, for
that is much bigger than I.

Do not tell me you've memorized countless passages, do not think,
with pride, that I care, or would take sides in, some mindless
battles over the "real" meaning of my words -- my words have NO
meaning, they are solely intended to suggest an ENTRANCE to a
world that is the ESSENCE of meaning.

Do not tell me you've fully grasped my concepts, tell me you've
entered the WORLD in which they were born.

Do not put on a mask of humility in front of me -- your humility
is nothing but a cross-dressing arrogance.
Do not look at me as a "Master" -- I LOATHE such concepts -- they
are untrue ... I have seen but a small piece of the truth
and immensity of this universe, and understand that I am NOTHING
-- but if you crystallize a concept of me as "master" in your
mind, that idea -- and the entire context it is but a small part
of -- effectively bars the door to ranges of your own inner
awareness required to access the infinite layers of the Real. I
am not a Master, and my writings are not the truth. I am someone
standing on the side of a road, pointing. Do not look at me. 
Look at the direction to which I point.

Do not waste time examining the clothes I'm dressed in, or the
intricacies of the hand doing the pointing, rather, examine your
backpack -- make sure you have gathered what you need for the
journey, and gotten rid of everything superfluous to it.

Do not get down on your knees in front of me -- understanding and
honoring ME is not the point. Get up on your feet, and walk.

Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application